|
Guest Editorial
Fact vs. Fiction in being a
‘Rearfoot and Ankle Surgeon’
by
Glenn M. Weinraub, DPM
gweinraub@faiv.com
Kaiser Permanente
San Francisco, California
‘Certainly
by doing a three year surgical residency I will be at the top of my
game once entering into practice…certainly I will make more money,
do more interesting cases, be better respected by my MD peers, have
better surgical results and be thought of as an overall great guy by
the O.R. staff.’
They say that nothing ruins good
operative results like follow-up. Well, having graduated from a
fairly high volume, well regarded residency about nine years ago, I
am here to give you the results of my “Residency Follow-up”.
Unfortunately, the “certainties” of
the first paragraph are simply not true. While I do have a practice
that requires me to perform reconstructive surgery of the rearfoot
and ankle, I still believe that the true test of a foot surgeon is
in his / her ability to obtain consistently good results in forefoot
reconstructive procedures. I once overheard a well respected orthopaedic surgeon tell his resident that it is much more difficult
to fix an unstable 2nd digit hammertoe than it is to fix a hip
fracture…he is right! Striving
for and obtaining good surgical outcomes will garner more respect
from your MD colleagues than pointing out that you are a rearfoot
and ankle surgeon.
Fortunately or unfortunately, having
a practice devoted to the rearfoot and ankle is not the smartest way
to build ones nest egg. Take for example the Charcot pantalar fusion
with the external fixator...this type of case may take up to 6 hours
to complete, and then there are the weekly post-op visits (which can
take up to 40 minutes given the external fixation). The economic
benefit of performing this type of work is minimal, but you do this
type of work because you love doing it!
As for doing more interesting cases,
I still believe that the forefoot provides a more consistent source
of technically challenging surgical opportunities than the rearfoot
and ankle. During my training, the best technically skilled surgical
whom I had the pleasure of working with was almost exclusively a
forefoot surgeon.
One observation I have noted over the
years is that surgeons are very pre-occupied with being highly
regarded by the OR staff in the hospital / surgery center. For good
or bad, the folks in the OR always believe that the doctor who gets
done the fastest is the best surgeon, they simply will not be
impressed by your 5 hour triple arthrodesis.
So, what have I learned in the last 9
years since residency? First and foremost is to be humble and
honest, both with your patients and yourself. Second is that we are
neither forefoot surgeons nor rearfoot surgeons, rather we are
Podiatric Surgeons. And finally remember (somewhat tongue in cheek)
the following from Campbell’s text…”good surgical judgment comes
from experience, and experience comes from poor surgical judgment”.
Huh ? |